Here is a poem I wrote on the Butterfly Effect and the wikipedia explanation of what it means.

THE BUTTERFLY EFFECT TRANSFORMS ALL LIFE

Is life chaotic or ordered?

Is it confusing or clear?

Uncontrollable or predictable?

Stable or unstable?

Under what conditions?

Is it the viewer or the object that changes?

Are we separate parts or the whole mosaic?

Is this cause and effect?

Is this the butterfly effect?

The caterpillar transforms into the butterfly,

Wriggling free of its narrow dark cocoon,

For the life of the caterpillar is eating, crawling and simplicity,

Then metamorphous incubates from lava,

The end of one life cycle catalyses the beginning of another,

Only nature knows the exact timing and trend,

For each snake must shed its skin in the end.

Wisdom is the phoenix rising from the ashes,

As the transformed know the purpose is to fly,

We may ask the reasons why?

To discover change is inevitable,

Change is incredible,

As evolution and transformation are natural states of being,

Sensitively tuned into our true nature,

For cycles of birth and death is change,

Every moment is the change agent,

For we are all agents of change,

Yet so many fear change,

How can one fear what is inevitable?

Better to surrender and transform,

For as we flap our wings,

As we try for new beginnings,

As we step off the cliff of our worldview,

The whole world changes to re-view our change,

As all is interconnected as an integral whole,

A holographic geometry of symmetrical codes.

Therefore:

‘To be the change you wish to see in the world’

Changes your world,

For you are the world,

You see,

Is it tooth and claw or free?

Remember it is the truth that sets you free to see,

ReaCtive
or
Creative,

When you C first,

Creative is the new trajectory.

Also:

Every thought,

Every action,

Every re-action,

Is an equal and opposite reaction,

As duality creates opposites,

Moving towards and away from equilibrium,

Unity to disunity to unity,

As a global movement,

For this is the butter fly effect of change,

That is inevitable,

For this is incredible symmetry when Creative,

Taking life on greater and greater spiral trajectories,

Of infinite growth.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_effect

Butterfly effect

Point attractors in 2D phase space

In chaos theory, the butterfly effect is the sensitive dependence on initial conditions, where a small change at one place in a deterministic nonlinear system can result in large differences to a later state. The name of the effect, coined by Edward Lorenz, is derived from the theoretical example of a hurricane’s formation being contingent on whether or not a distant butterfly had flapped its wings several weeks before.

Although the butterfly effect may appear to be an esoteric and unlikely behavior, it is exhibited by very simple systems: for example, a ball placed at the crest of a hill may roll into any of several valleys depending on, among other things, slight differences in initial position.

The butterfly effect is a common trope in fiction when presenting scenarios involving time travel and with hypotheses where one storyline diverges at the moment of a seemingly minor event resulting in two significantly different outcomes.

Origin of the concept and the term

Chaos theory and the sensitive dependence on initial conditions was described in the literature in a particular case of the three-body problem by Henri Poincaré in 1890.^[1] He later proposed that such phenomena could be common, for example, in meteorology.^{[citation needed]}

In 1898,^[1] Jacques Hadamard noted general divergence of trajectories in spaces of negative curvature. Pierre Duhem discussed the possible general significance of this in 1908.^[1] The idea that one butterfly could eventually have a far-reaching ripple effect on subsequent historic events first appears in “A Sound of Thunder“, a 1952 short story by Ray Bradbury about time travel (see Literature and print here).

In 1961, Lorenz was using a numerical computer model to rerun a weather prediction, when, as a shortcut on a number in the sequence, he entered the decimal .506 instead of entering the full .506127. The result was a completely different weather scenario.^[2] In 1963 Lorenz published a theoretical study of this effect in a well-known paper called Deterministic Nonperiodic Flow.^[3] Elsewhere he said^{[citation needed]} that “One meteorologist remarked that if the theory were correct, one flap of a seagull‘s wings could change the course of weather forever.” Following suggestions from colleagues, in later speeches and papers Lorenz used the more poetic butterfly. According to Lorenz, when he failed to provide a title for a talk he was to present at the 139th meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in 1972, Philip Merilees concocted Does the flap of a butterfly’s wings in Brazil set off a tornado in Texas? as a title. Although a butterfly flapping its wings has remained constant in the expression of this concept, the location of the butterfly, the consequences, and the location of the consequences have varied widely.^[4]

The phrase refers to the idea that a butterfly’s wings might create tiny changes in the atmosphere that may ultimately alter the path of a tornado or delay, accelerate or even prevent the occurrence of a tornado in another location. Note that the butterfly does not power or directly create the tornado. The flap of the wings is a part of the initial conditions; one set of conditions leads to a tornado while the other set of conditions doesn’t. The flapping wing represents a small change in the initial condition of the system, which causes a chain of events leading to large-scale alterations of events (compare: domino effect). Had the butterfly not flapped its wings, the trajectory of the system might have been vastly different – it’s possible that the set of conditions without the butterfly flapping its wings is the set that leads to a tornado.

Illustration

The butterfly effect in the Lorenz attractor
time 0 ≤ t ≤ 30 (larger)		z coordinate (larger)
These figures show two segments of the three-dimensional evolution of two trajectories (one in blue, the other in yellow) for the same period of time in the Lorenz attractor starting at two initial points that differ by only 10−5 in the x-coordinate. Initially, the two trajectories seem coincident, as indicated by the small difference between the z coordinate of the blue and yellow trajectories, but for t > 23 the difference is as large as the value of the trajectory. The final position of the cones indicates that the two trajectories are no longer coincident at t = 30.
A Java animation of the Lorenz attractor shows the continuous evolution.