Culture of Violence: Bowling for Columbine

I watched Michael Moore’s Bowling for Columbine documentary. It is a very powerful film and I felt courageous the way he spoke the truth. He spoke of the Columbine shootings by two young men and the shock it produced across the country. His story was very brave in respect of making the links between the Columbine High School shooting and the Lockheed Martin missile factory. The local violence compared to the international violence. It was interesting to listen to the interview with the Lockheed representative who wasn’t able to see the connection in respect of how people deal with violence. He made the point that people have to learn to not use violence, he indicated Lockheed Martin funded anger management in schools, yet the representative was not able to see the link with the violence of war. I found it interesting the justification as defence, protecting oneself, yet those protecting themselves hadn’t experienced violence directly, so it was an imagined threat for the majority of people.

Michael Moore was hot on the trail of Charlton Heston who was head of the National Rifle Association and how a rally was held after the Columbine shooting and also shortly after a little boy of 6 shot a little girl at school. He was clearly shown in the film to be racist and when asked about the violence in the US he spoke of mixed ethnicity and civil rights. Michael Moore contrasted with Canada a nation with 7 million guns out of 10 million families yet a very low murder rate compared to 11,127 per year in the US. In Australia it was 65, UK 68 and 39 Japan I recall. So the US rate was extremely high, he made the point that it linked to the fear. He clearly linked the culture of fear to the news media and the idea ‘when it bleeds it leads’. In reality, statistically the murder rate was going down, yet the purchase of arms increased.

A couple of features that was quite shocking from an Australian perspective is the ability to buy bullets over the counter. In the beginning of the film he opens a bank account and gets a free gun. The funny part there was he said do you really think you should give guns out at a bank. You just shake your head.

I went to Chicago last year and I did feel racial tension and a divide there. I wasn’t there long but did feel it. I clowned with an art student and love the photo of his arm around an African American security guard and her arm around him. Clowns can bridge the gap I believe. There is a little tension here in Australia with Indigenous people, but I tend to feel it is more that we don’t really know each other. Ignorance fuels it I feel and if people don’t take to the capitalist model, they are not seen as successful. For me, I really enjoy diversity and when you think about how those differences arise, they are attributable to climate and where people have come from. Those close to the equatorial parts of the world where it is hotter tend to be darker skinned. The lanolin in the skin protects the skin and the darker skin blocks out ultraviolet sunlight. Moreover, taller people disperse heat over a larger surface area. Whereas the whiter (pinker) people came from the colder northern regions where white skin is resistant to cold weather it has more vitamin D, their bodies are shorter to reduce the surface area and loss of heat. So those differences are only climate related overtime. If we all lived in the same place we’d be the same, so the differences are superficial. We all live in one world, we are all human and when we see no ethnicity we are seeing through the eyes of love. My former partner was Afghan, I forgot he was as I loved him. Love is colourblind.

I was thinking today about conflict, as I am into conflict resolution. Essentially we do not know how to communicate with each other and we believe our thoughts are right which can lock us into negative behaviours. I suspect so much frustration arises as we are not expressing ourselves or believing something untrue about others. Yet when dialogue is entered into in a way that is respectful, people start to see there is another way of viewing a problem, also a person feels heard which is very important to de-escalate conflict. Another important aspect of resolving conflict is listening, we don’t always hear each other. Moreover, you help people list options and arrive at solutions. This is important as we live together and the outcome should be some form of compromise for a win/win. Win/lose just creates resentment and in the extreme can lead to violence.

When I facilitated Alternatives to Violence, we had an activity called concentric circles where people spend 2-3 minutes really listening then they reflect back what was heard and swap over. Most people cannot reflect word for word what the other said, so they make up the words to express what they think they heard them say. Thus, I think learning communication, listening skills and then taking ownership of how we feel is so important, rather than projection of our problems onto others. For example if a person has racist thoughts, they are feeling uncomfortable around another person of an ethnic group, they have beliefs about them that evoke fear, so they project onto a person that fear. They may not know the person, but because the person appears of a certain ethnicity, the fear is generalised. We saw that with the Muslims after September 11 happened, every Muslim was a suspected terrorist, incredible fear. All the security at airports was vamped up on imagined threats, it was incredible. I thought if only that money was invested in peace education, not likely, fear gets the money. In Australia we had no terrorist threat. I did research on the terrorist hotline, it was amazing the fear created encouraging people to watch their neighbours and then reporting suspicious behaviour, can pitch one person against another. Bit like Macarthyism and Stalinism.

The power of the media is effective in shaping public opinion and I feel it creates the news. Very seldom do they look at the causes in news reports or report in ways that conflict can viewed by showing different perspectives not just to be seen to be balanced but actually seeking out both sides as a neutral third party. They could assist doing follow up stories that look at ‘resolving conflict’ by showing attitudes change through deeper understanding (communication), therapy, rehabilitation or restorative justice, to reinforce that we can problem solve to find solutions.

In the Bowling for Columbine film the question of why focus on the violence in the media, one of the answers was essentially that tolerance and harmony is not exciting. So they are feeding on the drama. The really important issues like solutions for climate change, building community, finding happiness, happy marriages and other good news stories are cast aside as dull and not money making. Interestingly, fear is an acronym for false evidence appearing real. We can collectively create a fearful world by focussing on it. As you seek for truth you will find answers and it does not become more fearful you actually start to see the fear is not real, it is believed. So if you change your beliefs you change your world. If I have fear about something I observe it then I see whether it actualises, if it doesn’t I note the fear was false.

The nuclear arms race I reflected on yesterday and saw it as Russian Roulette with millions of lives. In the literature there is an appropriate acronym called MAD – Mutually Assured Destruction. The idea if one launches the other launches in retaliation and high numbers of people die in both countries. In reality a lose/lose outcome. I really thought about that and it just amazes me that innocent people’s lives are gambled with by the power dynamics of politicians rather than focussing on the hard work of resolving conflict and developing cooperation and peace between nations. Some call it diplomacy but I would like to see them be replaced by conflict resolution experts and to look at creative ways to help countries understand each other. Sport has been used, but other ways could be utilised that are not competitive but inspiring and unifying. So just imagine a world that focuses on the positive and builds peace and understanding. You will live in another world and you will be so happy. This is not an ideal it is a clear choice – love or fear.

I will take a quick tangent to the Law of Attraction. If what we think about the most we attract into our reality, then the more we think of fear and violence, the more spooked we become the more of that we create in our reality. If you want peace and harmony that is where you focus. Expand thoughts and feelings of peace. That is why it starts with you.

I live a life where I don’t expose myself to any forms of media violence, my fear has dropped substantially. I walk at night and have no fear. It doesn’t even cross my mind anymore. I uplift myself with positive and self development books and I practice focusing on what I want. As a clown I see everyone as beautiful, guess what, that is what I experience. Always people speak to me, as I always say hi and chat to my community. I expect the best. I see everyone as a potential friend rather than a potential murderer. I so love living in a peaceful mind. I have a great life.

So let’s turn to Michael Moore’s movie Bowling for Columbine. It reveals the minds that are not peaceful.

Courtesy of wikipedia.

Bowling for Columbine is a 2002 documentary film written, directed, produced, and narrated by Michael Moore. The film explores what Michael Moore suggests are the causes for the Columbine High School massacre and other acts of violence with guns. Moore focuses on the background and environment in which the massacre took place and some common public opinions and assumptions about related issues. The film looks into the nature of violence in the United States.

The film brought Moore international attention as a rising filmmaker and won numerous awards, including the Academy Award for Best Documentary Feature, the Independent Spirit Award for Best Documentary Feature, a special 55th Anniversary Prize at the 2002 Cannes Film Festival[2] and the César Award for Best Foreign Film.

In Moore’s discussions with various people – including South Park co-creator Matt Stone, the National Rifle Association’s then-president Charlton Heston, and musician Marilyn Manson – he seeks to explain why the Columbine massacre occurred and why the United States has a high violent crime rate (especially crimes involving guns).

Bowling

The film title originates from the story that Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold – the two students responsible for the Columbine High School massacre – attended a school bowling class early that morning, at 6:00 a.m., before they committed the attacks at school starting at 11:19 a.m. Later investigation showed that this was based on mistaken recollections, and Glenn Moore of the Golden Police Department concluded that they were absent from school on the day of the attack.[4]

Moore incorporates the concept of bowling in other ways as well. For example, the Michigan militia uses bowling pins for their target practice. When interviewing former classmates of the two boys, Moore notes that the students took a bowling class in place of physical education. Moore notes this might have very little educational value; the girls he interviews generally agree. They note how Harris and Klebold had a very introverted lifestyle and a very careless attitude towards the game, and that nobody thought twice about it. Moore asks if the school system is responding to the real needs of their students or if they are reinforcing fear. Moore also interviews two young residents of Oscoda, Michigan, in a local bowling alley, and learns that guns are relatively easy to come by in the small town. Eric Harris spent some of his early years in Oscoda while his father was serving in the U.S. Air Force.

Moore compares gun ownership and gun violence in other countries with gun ownership and gun violence in the United States. Moore concludes that there is no connection between gun ownership and gun violence. In search of the reason for the United States’s trigger mania, Moore discovers a culture of fear created by the government and the media. He says that fear leads Americans to arm themselves, to gun-making companies’ advantage. Moore suggests sarcastically that bowling could have been just as responsible for the attacks on the school as Marilyn Manson, or even Bill Clinton, who launched bombing attacks on several countries around that time.[5]

Free gun for opening a bank account
Michael Moore upon receiving his free gun at the bank.[6]

An early scene depicts how Moore discovered a bank in Michigan that would give customers a free hunting rifle when they made a deposit of a certain size into a time deposit account.[6] The film follows Moore as he goes to the bank, makes his deposit, fills out the forms, and awaits the result of a background check before walking out of the bank carrying a brand new Weatherby hunting rifle.

Just before leaving the bank, Moore jokingly asks, “Do you think it’s a little dangerous handing out guns at a bank?”[7]
[edit] “Happiness is a Warm Gun” montage

About 20 minutes into the film, The Beatles song “Happiness Is a Warm Gun” plays during a montage in which the following footage is shown:

* People buying guns
* Residents of Virgin, Utah, a town that passed a law requiring all residents to own guns
* People firing rifles at carnivals and shooting ranges
* Footage of Denise Ames operating an assault rifle.
* Footage of Carey McWilliams, a visually impaired gun enthusiast.
* Footage of Gary Plauche killing Jeff Doucet, a man who had kidnapped his son and molested him.
* The suicide of Budd Dwyer
* A 1993 murder where Emilio Nuñez shot his ex-wife Maritza Martin to death during an interview on the Telemundo program Ocurrió Asi
* The suicide of Daniel V. Jones
* A man who takes his shirt off and is shot during a riot

Weapons of mass destruction

Early in the film, Moore links the violent behavior of the Columbine shooters to the presence in Littleton of a large defense establishment, manufacturing rocket technology. It is implied that the presence of this facility within the community, and the acceptance of institutionalized violence as a solution to conflict, contributed to the mindset that led to the massacre.

Moore conducts an interview with Evan McCollum, Director of Communications at a Lockheed Martin plant near Columbine, and asks him:

“So you don’t think our kids say to themselves, ‘Dad goes off to the factory every day, he builds missiles of mass destruction. What’s the difference between that mass destruction and the mass destruction over at Columbine High School?'”

McCollum responded:

“I guess I don’t see that specific connection because the missiles that you’re talking about were built and designed to defend us from somebody else who would be aggressors against us.”

“What a Wonderful World” montage

The film then cuts to a montage of rather treacherous American foreign policy decisions, with the intent to contradict McCollum’s statement by citing examples of how the United States has frequently been the aggressor nation. This montage is set to the song “What a Wonderful World” performed by Louis Armstrong.

The following is an exact transcript of the onscreen text in the Wonderful World segment:

1. 1953: U.S. overthrows Prime Minister Mohammed Mosaddeq of Iran. U.S. installs Shah as dictator.
2. 1954: U.S. overthrows democratically-elected President Arbenz of Guatemala. 200,000 civilians killed.
3. 1963: U.S. backs assassination of South Vietnamese President Diem.
4. 1963-1975: American military kills 4 million people in Southeast Asia.
5. September 11, 1973: U.S. stages 1973 Chilean coup d’état in Chile. Democratically-elected President Salvador Allende assassinated. Dictator Augusto Pinochet installed. 5,000 Chileans murdered.
6. 1977: U.S. backs military rulers of El Salvador. 70,000 Salvadorans and four American nuns killed.
7. 1980s: U.S. trains Osama bin Laden and fellow terrorists to kill Soviets. CIA gives them $3 billion.
8. 1981: Reagan administration trains and funds the Contras. 30,000 Nicaraguans die.
9. 1982: U.S. provides billions of dollars in aid to Saddam Hussein for weapons to kill Iranians.
10. 1983: The White House secretly gives Iran weapons to kill Iraqis.
11. 1989: CIA agent Manuel Noriega (also serving as President of Panama) disobeys orders from Washington. U.S. invades Panama and removes Noriega. 3,000 Panamanian civilian casualties.
12. 1990: Iraq invades Kuwait with weapons from U.S.
13. 1991: U.S. enters Iraq. Bush reinstates dictator of Kuwait.
14. 1998: Clinton bombs possible weapons factory in Sudan. Factory turns out to be making aspirin.
15. 1991 to present: American planes bomb Iraq on a weekly basis. U.N. estimates 500,000 Iraqi children die from bombing and sanctions.
16. 2000-2001: U.S. gives Taliban-ruled Afghanistan $245 million in aid.
17. Sept. 11, 2001: Osama bin Laden uses his expert CIA training to murder 3,000 people.

The montage then ends with handheld-camera footage of the second WTC plane crash, the audio consisting solely of the hysterical reactions of the witnesses, recorded by the camera’s microphone. On the website accompanying the film, Moore provides additional background information for this section.[8]
[edit] Climate of fear

Moore attempts to contrast this with the attitude prevailing in Canada, where (he states) gun ownership is at similar levels to the U.S. He illustrates his thesis by visiting neighborhoods in Canada near the Canada-U.S. border, where he finds front doors unlocked and much less concern over crime and security.

In this section, a montage of possible causes for gun violence are stated by several social pundits. Many claim links with violence in television, cinema, and computer games; towards the end of the montage, however, a series of statements all claim Marilyn Manson’s responsibility. Following this is an interview between Moore and Marilyn Manson. Manson shares his views about the United States’ climate with Moore, stating that he believes U.S. society is based on “fear and consumption”, citing Colgate commercials that promise “if you have bad breath, [people] are not going to talk to you” and other commercials containing fear-based messages, and that the media would rather point at him as the one responsible for the killings instead of the President, who ordered more bombings on Kosovo that specific day than any other. When Moore asks Manson what he would say to the students at Columbine, Manson replies, “I wouldn’t say a single word to them; I would listen to what they have to say, and that’s what no one did.”[9]

Statistics

Moore follows up his climate of fear thesis by exploring the popular explanations as to why gun violence is so high in the United States. He examines Marilyn Manson as a cause, but states that Germany listens to more Marilyn Manson and has a greater Goth population than does the United States, with less gun violence (Germany: 381 incidents per year). He examines violent movies, but notes that they have the same violent movies in other countries, showing The Matrix with French subtitles (France: 255 incidents per year). He also examines video games, but states that violent video games come from Japan (Japan: 39 incidents per year). He concludes his comparisons with the suggestion that the United States’ violent history is the cause, yet negating that with the violent histories of Germany, France, and the United Kingdom (UK: 68 incidents per year), Moore ends his segment with gun-related deaths-per-year statistics of a few major countries.

1. United States – 11,127 (3.601/100,000)
2. Germany – 381 (0.466/100,000)
3. France – 255 (0.389/100,000)
4. Canada – 165 (0.484/100,000)
5. United Kingdom – 68 (0.109/100,000)
6. Australia – 65 (0.292/100,000)
7. Japan – 39 (0.030/100,000)

KMart refund

Moore takes two Columbine victims, Mark Taylor and Richard Castaldo, to the American superstore KMart headquarters in Troy, Michigan, ostensibly to claim a refund on the bullets still lodged in their bodies. After a number of attempts to evade the issue, a KMart spokesperson says that the firm will change its policy and phase out the sale of handgun ammunition; this comes after Moore and the victims go to the nearest KMart store, purchase all of their ammunition, and return the next day with several members of the media. “We’ve won,” says Moore, in disbelief. “That was more than we asked for.”[10]

Reception

Reviews for the film were overwhelmingly positive, with a 96% rating on Rotten Tomatoes,[11] thus earning a “certified fresh” award. Michael Wilmington of the Chicago Tribune wrote, “It’s unnerving, stimulating, likely to provoke anger and sorrow on both political sides—and, above all, it’s extremely funny.”[12]

Some reviews were not as unequivocally glowing. A.O. Scott of The New York Times wrote, “The slippery logic, tendentious grandstanding, and outright demagoguery on display in Bowling for Columbine should be enough to give pause to its most ardent partisans, while its disquieting insights into the culture of violence in America should occasion sober reflection from those who would prefer to stop their ears.”[13] Desson Thomson of the Washington Post thought that the film lacked a coherent message, asking “A lot of this is amusing and somehow telling. But what does it all add up to?”[14]

Criticisms
Free gun for opening a bank account

In Michael Wilson’s documentary Michael Moore Hates America, bank employees from the branch at which Moore is given a free hunting rifle assert that they were misled during the filming of this segment. They say that the bank’s policy was to conduct background checks on rifle recipients and mail the rifles to a licensed gun dealer, but Moore’s agents, under the pretext of “doing a story on unique businesses across America,” are accused of convincing bank employees to have his rifle presented to him on camera the morning after filming his account opening. Further, they counter that contrary to the film’s supposition that the bank kept hundreds of guns on their premises, the gun which was handed to Michael in the film was shipped overnight from a vault in their Upper Peninsula branch “300 miles away.” Moore emphatically denies that this sequence was staged but admits the timing was compressed for production reasons. He reminds his readers that North Country Bank is a licensed firearms dealer, and in addition to its ATF license number, he produces out-takes where bank employee Jan Jacobson appears to confirm on camera that rifles are secured locally on bank premises.[15][16]

Ignoring the role of municipal governance

The American Prospect published a piece by Garance Franke-Ruta criticizing the film for ignoring the role that municipal governance plays in crime in the United States, and ignoring African American urban victims of violence while focusing on the unusual events of Columbine. “A decline in murders in New York City alone—from 1,927 in 1993 to 643 in 2001—had, for example, a considerable impact on the declining national rate. Not a lot of those killers or victims were the sort of sports-hunters or militiamen Moore goes out of his way to interview and make fun of.”[17]

Weapons of mass destruction

After the release of the film, Lockheed Martin spokesperson Evan McCollum clarified that the plant no longer produces missiles (the plant manufactured parts for intercontinental ballistic missiles with a nuclear warhead in the mid-1980s), but rockets used for launching satellites:

I provided specific information to Moore about the space launch vehicles we build to launch spacecraft for NASA, NOAA, the Dept. of Defense and commercial customers, including DirecTV and EchoStar.[18]

Erik Möller argues that Moore’s question was not limited to the Littleton-area Lockheed Martin facility:

First, note the word “our” in Moore’s question. Moore is not from Colorado — his question is generic, not meant to refer specifically to the Lockheed Martin plant in question. … Of course, critics [David Hardy, et al.] have conveniently ignored the fact that Lockheed Martin does supply weapons of mass destruction to the US military, and that the company is the nation’s largest military contractor.[18]

As of 2008[update], Lockheed Martin is the world’s largest defense contractor by revenue, which Moore states in the film.[19]
[edit] Matt Stone

Being from Littleton, Matt Stone agreed to talk with Moore about his hometown and the shooting. Although he did not feel that Moore mischaracterized him or his statements in the film, he harbors ill feelings about the cartoon “A Brief History of the United States of America”. Both Stone and his fellow South Park producer Trey Parker feel that the cartoon was done in a style very similar to theirs. Also, its proximity to Stone’s interview may have led some viewers to believe, incorrectly, that they created the cartoon. As a result, Moore was depicted as a gibbering, overweight, hot-dog eating buffoon who ultimately commits a suicide bombing against the protagonists in their 2004 film, Team America: World Police.[20]
[edit] Charlton Heston interview

Moore visited Charlton Heston in his home and asked him about American firearm violence. Heston’s response included the suggestion that the United States had a “history of violence” and more “mixed ethnicity” than other countries.[21][22] Moore then asked Heston if he’d like to apologize for leading NRA rallies in Flint after the Buell Elementary School shooting and in Littleton after the Columbine shooting, upon which Heston walked out of the interview.[23] Moore was criticized for his ambush of the actor.[24]
[edit] MPAA rating

The film is rated R (restricted) by the Motion Picture Association of America, which means that children under the age 17 are not able to view the film unless under supervision. Film critic Roger Ebert chastised the MPAA for this move as “banning teenagers from those films they most need to see.”[25] Ebert has criticized the MPAA rating system on past occasions. The film was noted for “some violent images and language”.
[edit] Awards and nominations

* 2002 Winner, 55th Anniversary Prize, 2002 Cannes Film Festival[2]
* 2003 Winner, César Award, Best Foreign Film
* 2003 Winner, International Documentary Association (IDA), – Best Documentary of All Time
* 2003 Winner, Academy Award, Best Documentary Features

During the screening at the 2002 Cannes Film Festival the film received a 13-minute standing ovation.[26] It also won “Most Popular International Film” at the 2002 Vancouver International Film Festival.

Moore was both applauded and booed at the Academy Awards on March 23, 2003, when he used his acceptance speech as an opportunity to proclaim his opposition to the United States led invasion of Iraq, which had begun just a few days prior.[27]

Bowling for Columbine was voted the third most popular film in the Channel 4 program, The 50 Greatest Documentaries of all time, in 2005.
[edit] Gross income

With a budget of $4 million, Bowling for Columbine grossed $58,008,423 worldwide, including $21,576,018 in the United States.[28] The documentary also broke box office records internationally, becoming the highest-grossing documentary in the United Kingdom, Australia, and Austria. These records were later eclipsed by another Moore documentary, Fahrenheit 9/11.[