Is Surveillance Capitalism Breaching Your Privacy?

There is the silent infiltration of surveillance capitalism quietly reaching into all lives online.  I have had a little black box open up on this blog which appears to be something to do with surveillance.  I blogged it a few days ago.  Surveillance awakened me to risk management, control and disregard for privacy.  I had an emotional reaction to it as I had nightmares, subconsciously I felt threatened.  I felt my freedom of movement curtailed for the first time in my life.  Then I started to realise that there were cameras in the street lives which meant people can be tracked as they move in cars.  I then found out about smart meters and the fact they are Local Area Networks in households monitoring all appliances and activity.  They have a sim card in the meter itself. This meant I couldn’t plug my computer in without fear of it being monitored given I am speaking up these days.  I found out that the Smart TV’s can record people and new this was possible as in market research we used people meters monitors.  The Brave New world became apparent when I was homeless and I openly challenged Centrelink to discover someone filming where I was staying in my drive way.   I know when I log into this library computer it has my name and details associated any hacker can work it out. Moreover, I note the camera on the computer is at the bottom of the screen so no-one notices, I put my pencil case in front as I do not want to be filmed.  I consider it an intrusion.  I realise it is now like an open window.  It is like people looking in your windows.  I find it very concerning for society as they are the ones mostly surveilled, although the entire business world is now having to invest in cyber security to try and protect innovations, business intelligence and personal lives.  The iPhones are a tracking device where your location is pinpointed, what you talk about can be recorded and you can be profiled based on what you have disclosed online.  for those who do not have your best interests at heart it could become a means of silencing you or disconnecting you.  I had to give up my phone as I didn’t want surveillance in my life.  So I made a choice.  I want my privacy not because I am hiding anything it is because I choose self determination over who I speak to and who I don’t, what I share and what I don’t, what is private and what is public.  I value my privacy as my life lived without external scrutiny.   I disclose what I do online as I believe in visibility as a form of freedom of speech but this is my own choice, not data surreptitiously gathered by someone else who are not looking out for my highest interests.  I do not give permission to legal or illegal surveillance. I give permission for dialogue to solve problems and am open to share my truth with others if they have concerns.  I do not give permission for profiling or tracking.

I do not think the terminology ‘Person Of Interest’ should justify official surveillance. Pre-emptive approaches are used to justify intrusions based on no evidence and may well be to  suppress freedom of speech and democratic rights. If a person is speaking out against corruption then those concerned may engage in this behaviour to protect themselves, but I would state it is illegal conduct.  Surveillance equipment is available commercially, so anyone can invade or set up another on the basis of this technology. It can bring out the worst in people as they wait to catch someone to discredit them.  It can also work for the good if it saves a person from attack and ensures their safety.

The core question is – is surveillance in the public interest?

Surveillance capitalism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (my bolding)

Jump to navigationJump to search

Surveillance capitalism is a novel market form and a specific logic of capitalist accumulation that was popularised in a 2014 essay by business theorist and social scientist Shoshana Zuboff. She characterized it as a “radically disembedded and extractive variant of information capitalism” based on the commodification of “reality” and its transformation into behavioral data for analysis and sales.[1][2][3][4]

In a subsequent 2015 scholarly article, Zuboff analyzed the societal implications of this mutation of capitalism. She differentiated “surveillance assets”, “surveillance capital”, and “surveillance capitalism” and their dependence on a global architecture of computer mediation that she calls “Big Other“, a distributed and largely uncontested new expression of power which constitutes hidden mechanisms of extraction, commodification, and control that threatens core values such as freedom, democracy, and privacy.[5][6]

According to Zuboff, surveillance capitalism was pioneered at Google and later Facebook, in much the same way that mass-production and managerial capitalism were pioneered at Ford and General Motors a century earlier, and has now become the dominant form of information capitalism.[7]

In her Oxford University lecture published in 2016, Zuboff identified surveillance capitalism’s mechanisms and practices, including the manufacture of “prediction products” for sale in new “behavioral futures markets”. She introduced the concept “dispossession by surveillance” and argued that it challenges the psychological and political bases of self-determination as it concentrates rights in the surveillance regime. This is described as a “coup from above”.[8]


Economic pressures of capitalism are driving the intensification of connection and monitoring online with spaces of social life becoming open to saturation by corporate actors, directed at the making of profit and/or the regulation of action.[6] Relevantly, Turow writes that “centrality of corporate power is a direct reality at the very heart of the digital age“. [6][9]:17 Capitalism has become focused on expanding the proportion of social life that is open to data collection and data processing.[6] This may come with significant implications for vulnerability and control of society as well as for privacy. However, increased data collection may also have various advantages for individuals and society such as self-optimization (Quantified Self),[6] societal optimizations (such as by smart cities) and new or optimized services (such as various Google applications). Still, collecting and processing data in the context of capitalism’s core profit-making motive might present an inherent danger.

Zuboff contrasts mass production of industrial capitalism with surveillance capitalism with the former being interdependent with its populations who were its consumers and employees and the latter preying on dependent populations who are neither its consumers nor its employees and largely ignorant of its procedures.[7]

She notes that surveillance capitalism reaches beyond the conventional institutional terrain of the private firm and accumulates not only surveillance assets and capital, but also rights and operates without meaningful mechanisms of consent.[7] Surveillance has been changing power structures in the information economy.[10] This might present a further power shift beyond the nation-state and towards a form of corporatocracy.[citation needed]

Oliver Stone, creator of the film Snowden pointed to the location-based game Pokémon Go as the “latest sign of the emerging phenomenon of surveillance capitalism“.[11][12][13]

In 2014 Vincent Mosco referred to the marketing of information about customers and subscribers to advertisers as surveillance capitalism and makes note of the surveillance state alongside it.[14] Christian Fuchs found that the surveillance state fuses with surveillance capitalism.[15] Similarly Zuboff informs that the issue is further complicated by highly invisible collaborative arrangements with state security apparatuses.[16] According to Trebor Scholz, companies recruit people as informants for this type of capitalism.[17]

The term “surveillance capitalism” has also been used by political economists John Bellamy Foster and Robert W. McChesney, though with a different meaning. In an article published in Monthly Review in 2014, they apply it to describe the manifestation of the “insatiable need for data” of financialization, which they explain is “the long-term growth speculation on financial assets relative to GDP” introduced in the United States by industry and government in the 1980s that evolved out of the military-industrial complex and the advertising industry.[18]

Key features[edit]

Zuboff identifies four key features in the logic of surveillance capitalism and explicitly follows the four key features identified by Google’s chief economist, Hal Varian:[19][better source needed]

  1. The drive toward more and more data extraction and analysis.
  2. The development of new contractual forms using computer-monitoring and automation.
  3. The desire to personalize and customize the services offered to users of digital platforms.
  4. The use of the technological infrastructure to carry out continual experiments on its users and consumers.

Countermeasures and solutions[edit]

Numerous organizations have been struggling for free speech and privacy rights in the new surveillance capitalism[20] and various national governments have enacted privacy laws. It is also conceivable that new capabilities and uses for mass-surveillance require structural changes towards a new system to prevent misuse.

Zuboff compares demanding privacy from surveillance capitalists or lobbying for an end to commercial surveillance on the Internet to asking Henry Ford to make each Model T by hand and states that such demands are existential threats that violate the basic mechanisms of the entity’s survival.[7]

Zuboff warns that principles of self-determination might be forfeited due to “ignorance, learned helplessness, inattention, inconvenience, habituation, or drift” and states that “we tend to rely on mental models, vocabularies, and tools distilled from past catastrophes”, referring to the twentieth century’s totalitarian nightmares or the monopolistic predations of Gilded Age capitalism, with countermeasures that have been developed to fight those earlier threats not being sufficient or even appropriate to meet the novel challenges.[7]

She also poses the question: “will we be the masters of information, or will we be its slaves?” and states that “if the digital future is to be our home, then it is we who must make it so”.[21]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Zuboff, Shoshana (15 September 2014). “A Digital Declaration: Big Data as Surveillance Capitalism”. FAZ.NET (in German). ISSN 0174-4909. Retrieved 2018-08-28.


  2. ^ Powles, Julia (2 May 2016). “Google and Microsoft have made a pact to protect surveillance capitalism”. The Guardian. Retrieved 9 February 2017.
  3. ^ Sterling, Bruce (March 2016). “Shoshanna Zuboff condemning Google “surveillance capitalism. WIRED.
  4. ^ “The Unlikely Activists Who Took On Silicon Valley — and Won”. New York Times. 14 August 2018. Retrieved 2018-08-28.
  5. ^ Zuboff, Shoshana (4 April 2015). “Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization”. Journal of Information Technology. 30 (1): 75–89. doi:10.1057/jit.2015.5. ISSN 0268-3962. – via SSRN.
  6. ^ Jump up to: a b c d e Couldry, Nick (23 September 2016). “The price of connection: ‘surveillance capitalism. The Conversation.
  7. ^ Jump up to: a b c d e Zuboff, Shoshana (5 March 2016). “Google as a Fortune Teller: The Secrets of Surveillance Capitalism”. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. Retrieved 9 February 2017.
  8. ^ Zuboff, Shoshana (5 March 2016). “Google as a Fortune Teller: The Secrets of Surveillance Capitalism”. FAZ.NET (in German). ISSN 0174-4909. Retrieved 2018-08-28.
  9. ^ Turow, Joseph (10 January 2012). The Daily You: How the New Advertising Industry Is Defining Your Identity and Your Worth. Yale University Press. p. 256. ISBN 0300165013. Retrieved 9 February 2017.
  10. ^ Galič, Maša; Timan, Tjerk; Koops, Bert-Jaap (13 May 2016). “Bentham, Deleuze and Beyond: An Overview of Surveillance Theories from the Panopticon to Participation”. Philosophy & Technology. doi:10.1007/s13347-016-0219-1.
  11. ^ “Comic-Con 2016: Marvel turns focus away from the Avengers, ‘Game of Thrones’ cosplay proposals, and more”. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 9 February 2017.
  12. ^ “Oliver Stone Calls Pokémon Go “Totalitarian. Fortune. 23 July 2016.
  13. ^ Surveillance capitalism, robot totalitarianism’: Oliver Stone lashes out at Pokemon Go”. RT International. 22 July 2016.
  14. ^ Mosco, Vincent. To the Cloud: Big Data in a Turbulent World. Routledge. ISBN 9781317250388. Retrieved 9 February 2017.
  15. ^ Fuchs, Christian. Social Media: A Critical Introduction. SAGE. ISBN 9781473987494. Retrieved 9 February 2017.
  16. ^ “Shoshana Zuboff / Keynote: Reality is the Next Big Thing – Elevate Festival 2014”. YouTube. 2 May 2016. Retrieved 9 February 2017.
  17. ^ Scholz, Trebor. Uberworked and Underpaid: How Workers Are Disrupting the Digital Economy. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 9781509508181. Retrieved 9 February 2017.
  18. ^ “Surveillance Capitalism | John Bellamy Foster | Monthly Review”. Monthly Review. 2014-07-01. Retrieved 2018-02-12.
  19. ^ Danaher, John (21 March 2016). “The Logic of Surveillance Capitalism”. Algocracy and the Transhumanist Project. Retrieved 9 February 2017.
  20. ^ Foster, John Bellamy; McChesney, Robert W. (1 July 2014). “Surveillance Capitalism by John Bellamy Foster”. Monthly Review. Retrieved 9 February 2017.
  21. ^ Zuboff, Shoshana (15 September 2014). “Shoshana Zuboff: A Digital Declaration”. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. Retrieved 9 February 2017.

Further reading[edit]

  • Zuboff, Shoshana (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: PublicAffairs. ISBN 9781610395694.
  • Zuboff, Shoshana (2018). Das Zeitalter des Überwachungskapitalismus. Berlin: Campus Verlag. ISBN 9783593509303.

External links[edit]

Mohandas Gandhi

“My life is my message.”